Summary

Housing is one of the fundamental human needs, extending beyond a mere physical place to live. It signifies a house—a space of identity, security, privacy, and social inclusion. It meets not only material but also psychological and social needs, from relationships to self-realization. Its value increases with age, as it becomes associated with memories, accomplishments, and a sense of belonging. Among Slovenians, housing holds a special significance, as the majority are homeowners, with house ownership predominating. Owning a house represents more than just property—it is a symbol of independence, stability, and a connection to the natural environment. It embodies the fulfillment of life goals and reflects a culturally ingrained ideal. The historical development of this housing pattern dates back to the post–World War II period, when social and economic reforms enabled greater private investment, albeit within the constraints of a planned economy. During times of inflation, people invested in building their own houses, viewing them as a secure investment and a pathway to personal freedom. The phenomenon of self-construction became widespread, especially in rural areas and small towns where land was more accessible. At the same time, living in a house continued a traditional way of life, often linked to a farming background. However, as Slovenians are traditionally reluctant to move, those who built houses in the past have mostly remained in them for life. Houses were typically built as multi-generational residences, with the expectation that children would also live in them. In many cases, however, children moved out, leaving their parents alone. Consequently, many large family houses became half-empty or even fully vacant, especially after the deaths of older residents or their relocation to nursing homes. Elderly individuals who remain in these houses often live in unsuitable conditions, as the houses are too large, energy-inefficient, and difficult to maintain. Nevertheless, many older people are reluctant to move due to emotional attachment. For them, these houses are not merely dwellings but the result of long-term physical and financial investment—life’s work and personal sacrifice. They see their houses as symbols of stability, independence, and achievement. In the context of modern demographic and housing challenges, large family houses with underused or vacant living spaces represent significant housing potential. Slovenia is facing a serious shortage of affordable housing and limited access to public rental options. In this context, empty or partially empty large family houses could be one of the key resources to address the housing shortage, particularly since housing preferences still tend toward individual living arrangements—namely, houses. The question of how to activate this housing potential is critical from the perspectives of efficient housing stock utilization, intergenerational solidarity, and sustainable spatial development. This is not merely a matter of physical real estate but a complex social issue that requires understanding the social, economic, and psychological dimensions influencing homeowner behaviour, as well as the needs, preferences, and desires of potential users—whether they would be tenants or owners.